A Comparison of Peer Influence and Peer Selection Effects in the Context of Female Adolescents' Sexual Debut
Abstract
Peers are an important source of normative pressure in the
context of adolescent risky behaviors, which is reflected in
high behavioral homophily repeatedly found in adolescent
groups. Two psychosocial mechanisms underlying this
similarity have been identified: peer influence (or pressure)
and peer selection (the process of befriending individuals
similar to oneself). The two mechanisms have been explored
primarily in the context of non-sexual adolescent risk taking
(e.g., tobacco, alcohol and drug abuse). This study is the first
longitudinal comparison of peer influence and peer selection
in the context of female adolescents' sexual initiation. Using
data from 162 female high-school students (Mage = 16
years, SD = 0.47) surveyed online twice in the period of 18
months, a cross-lagged path analysis pointed to a significant
effect of peer influence, but not peer selection. Contrary to
expectations, the moderating effect of peer conformism was
not corroborated. This study’s findings confirm the
importance of taking into account direct and indirect peer
influence when designing comprehensive sexuality education
programs.
context of adolescent risky behaviors, which is reflected in
high behavioral homophily repeatedly found in adolescent
groups. Two psychosocial mechanisms underlying this
similarity have been identified: peer influence (or pressure)
and peer selection (the process of befriending individuals
similar to oneself). The two mechanisms have been explored
primarily in the context of non-sexual adolescent risk taking
(e.g., tobacco, alcohol and drug abuse). This study is the first
longitudinal comparison of peer influence and peer selection
in the context of female adolescents' sexual initiation. Using
data from 162 female high-school students (Mage = 16
years, SD = 0.47) surveyed online twice in the period of 18
months, a cross-lagged path analysis pointed to a significant
effect of peer influence, but not peer selection. Contrary to
expectations, the moderating effect of peer conformism was
not corroborated. This study’s findings confirm the
importance of taking into account direct and indirect peer
influence when designing comprehensive sexuality education
programs.
Keywords
peer networks; adolescents; peer influence vs selection mechanism; sexual debut; longitudinal assessments
Full Text:
PDF (Hrvatski)Viewing Statistics
- Abstract - 279
- PDF (Hrvatski) - 140
Copyright (c) 2019 Marko Lucić, Aleksandar Štulhofer
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Međunarodna licenca/ International License:
Imenovanje-Nekomercijalno/Attribution-NonCommercial
Pogledajte licencu/View license deeds
Print ISSN 1330-0288 | Online ISSN 1848-6096